In 2025, millions of Texans are seeing their electricity bills rise—some by as much as $40 per month, according to recent modeling by consumer advocacy groups. A key driver behind this shift is the passage of Texas House Bill 5174, dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill", which reduces incentives for renewable energy while increasing support for natural gas and other dispatchable sources.
This legislative turn marks a shift for a state that had previously led the U.S. in wind and solar deployment. While proponents say the bill strengthens reliability and energy independence, critics warn it may discourage clean energy investment, raise costs for consumers, and slow progress toward emissions reduction. Combined with rising demand from AI data centers, industrial growth, and extreme weather, the ERCOT grid is under growing pressure.
This article explores how Texas’s evolving energy policies may affect long-term affordability, resilience, and climate goals.
Enacted in 2023 and fully implemented in 2025, House Bill 5174—often referred to as the “Big Beautiful Bill”—is a sweeping grid reform law backed by state leadership. It provides up to $10 billion in incentives for dispatchable power sources like natural gas and introduces penalties for renewables underperforming during peak demand.
Major provisions include:
Environmental and industry analysts argue that the bill tilts the market away from renewables. According to the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), this legislation could delay or cancel up to 25 GW of renewable energy projects, eroding the cost and emissions advantages that wind and solar offer (EDF).
The cost implications are becoming more visible. Modeling by ACORE and Texans for Fair Energy Pricing suggests that the bill could increase residential electricity bills by $480 to $510 annually starting in 2026. Key factors include:
From 2015 to 2021, Texas enjoyed electricity rates below the U.S. average, thanks to rapid renewable adoption and market competition (EIA). But that trend is reversing. In early 2025, ERCOT’s wholesale prices rose over 18% year-on-year, driven by high summer loads and lagging new renewable supply.
These cost pressures are also hitting industrial and commercial users, potentially affecting Texas’s economic competitiveness in high-energy sectors.
Texas’s grid is under increasing strain from the rapid expansion of power-intensive industries. By 2027, AI data centers alone are projected to add 9 GW of new load, according to ERCOT’s long-term forecast—roughly equivalent to the consumption of 1.8 million homes (ERCOT).
Supporters of HB 5174 argue this demand surge justifies new investment in gas-fired generation. However, critics say that alternative solutions—such as grid-scale storage, demand response, and renewables paired with smart controls—are being deprioritized.
Additionally, some data center developers are signing private renewable energy PPAs to meet their corporate climate goals. Companies like Google and Meta have raised concerns that state-level policy friction may complicate these long-term commitments (Google Report).
The direction of Texas’s energy policy appears increasingly out of step with federal climate and energy incentives. Under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the federal government has made over $370 billion available for clean energy development, including tax credits and project financing.
Despite these federal incentives, HB 5174 creates hurdles for clean energy developers in Texas:
Texas ranks #1 for wind and #2 for solar potential in the U.S., but developers are increasingly shifting investment to states with more aligned policies. Rystad Energy reports a 35% drop in new Texas solar capacity in Q1 2025 compared to Q1 2024 (Rystad).
This divergence may weaken Texas’s leadership position in clean energy and limit consumer access to low-cost renewable electricity.
The “Big Beautiful Bill” is reshaping Texas’s energy trajectory. While it aims to bolster reliability and ensure sufficient firm capacity, its near-term effects include higher costs for households, slower renewable deployment, and a possible increase in emissions.
As the state confronts extreme weather, surging demand, and technological change, it must carefully balance grid reliability with long-term affordability and decarbonization. A policy framework that leverages both Texas’s abundant renewable resources and federal incentives could deliver a more resilient and competitive energy future.
The coming years will reveal whether Texas’s energy policy shift is a short-term recalibration—or a long-term departure from its previous role as a clean energy leader.
References
Over 200 companies are quietly pausing or revising their SBTi targets in 2025. This article investigates whether this trend reflects a strategic ESG recalibration amid regulatory pressure, scope 3 complexity, and greenhushing concerns—or signals a broader shift in corporate climate accountability.
